|
Catalog Description
Intensive study of critical theory, literary criticism, and research methods. Introduction to graduate-level writing and research, including compiling bibliographies, using scholarly resources, and writing critical research papers.
Nature of the Course
This seminar is designed for students qualified for admission to the MA program in English. An English MA candidate may not be enrolled in any other 600 level course without completion of or concurrent enrolment in English 696. Its purpose is to train graduate students in basic literary research methods (including techniques of bibliography, an introduction to important literary reference works, and the writing of research papers), and preeminently in literary theory. The course will concentrate on major twentieth century theories of literature and literary criticism. The writing of theoretically informed research papers will be an integral part of the course.
Expected Student Learning Outcomes
By the end of the course you should be able to:
- show an understanding of the principles and procedures for bibliographic research
- make optimal use of the library, its electronic resources and know when and how to resort to facilities outside the university library
- make correct use of the MLA Handbook in all your printed papers
- understand and employ in oral and written form many of the most important literary theories of the twentieth century
- prepare and write research papers employing theory
Course Texts
The following text has been ordered from the University Bookstore:
- Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism. Ed. Ross Murfin. 3rd ed. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010. Print.
- Leitch, Vincent B, ed. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 2010. Print.
- Selden, Raman. Practicing Theory and Reading Literature: An Introduction. Lexington, KY: UP of Kentucky, 1989. Print.
- Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Susanne L. Wofford. Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1993. Print.
Optional Texts
- Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 7th ed. New York: MLA, 2009. Print.
- Harner, James L, On Compiling an Annotated Bibliography. 2nd ed. New York: MLA, 2000. Print.
- Parker, Robert Dale. How to Interpret Literature: Critical Theory for Literary and Cultural Studies. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2014. Print.
- Selden, Raman, Peter Widdowson, and Peter Brooker. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. 5th ed. New York: Pearson, 2005. Print.
- Waugh, Patricia. Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 2006. Print.
-
- You should also consult the following:
- Groden, Michael, Martin Kreiswirth, and Imre Szewman, eds. The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2004. Print. (in the University 1st Floor Reference Library).
Course Requirements
BEACHBOARD. This syllabus and its supplements “Choice of Overview Topics for Oral Presentation,” “Choice of Overview Topics for Oral Presentation,” “Choice of Theorist’s Essay for Oral Presentation,” "Writing The Paper Based on your Oral Presentation," and “Preparing an Annotated Bibliography” are available on Beachboard. Grades for your various papers (except for reaction papers) will be posted on Beachboard once they are awarded.
ATTENDANCE. Regular attendance is important and counts towards your grade. If you are unavoidably absent please email me in advance. More than three unexcused absences will lower your course grade by a grade point. More than six unexcused absences could result in a course grade of F. See “Makeup and Attendance Policy” below.
READING. You are all expected to have read the theoretical essays from the Norton Anthology of Theory listed in the syllabus before the class concerned, plus the introduction to it by the editor and the relevant section of one of the general guides to literary theory listed as Optional Texts above.
REACTION PAPERS. You are required to produce a one-page printed reaction paper (MLA style, but using 1.5 spacing) to one or more of the theoretical essays (not the editors’ introductions to them) listed in the syllabus on ten of the thirteen occasions when texts from the Norton Anthology are specified, and to leave it with me at the end the class. Papers will be graded acceptable (a check), unacceptable (a cross), or exceptional (two checks). Reaction papers will be accepted up to a week late, but recorded as late and treated as if they had had a grade point deducted.
ORAL PRESENTATIONS AND RELATED PAPER. All sessions after the first one will be conducted as participatory seminars. Starting with Reader Response Criticism, each of you is required to select from the syllabus 1) one theory on which to offer an overview (see Beachboard document: “Choice of Overview Topics for Oral Presentation”), and 2) an essay of a different theorist to explain in detail (see Beachboard document: “Choice of Theorist’s Essay for Oral Presentation”). Please consult me in person or by email before finalizing your presentation of an overview of a theory.
1) For the overview of the theory you should consult the relevant chapter in one of the three books listed under “Optional Texts” above (Parker, Selden, or Waugh), the John Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism (in the Reference Library), and one or two other books or essays focused on the theory concerned. Your presentation should be accompanied by a printed summary of it (not a verbatim transcript) and a brief bibliography for distribution to the rest of the class (about 3-4 pages in total). You are encouraged to use visual material to help students follow you better. One week after the presentation you should submit to me a typed paper of 5-6 pages in MLA style (including works cited) on some aspect of the presentation that most interests you. This should take the form of an argument citing at least four sources. You will be graded solely on the basis of this follow-up paper. (See "Writing the Paper Based on your Oral Presentation" on Beachboard).
2) For the presentation of the essay by a theorist give a detailed explication of the text in the Norton Anthology specified in the syllabus (including taking students through key passages using page numbers in the Norton Anthology), and briefly locate it within the wider framework of the theory. No written paper is required for this oral.
APPLICATIONS. For classes devoted to the application of a theory each of you should be prepared to offer a five minute oral summary on how you would apply the theory to Heart of Darkness or Hamlet from notes (that refer to page numbers of the text selected) prepared by you beforehand. Alternatively you can report on a critic’s application of the theory to either of the set texts found in a book or scholarly journal (other than in the Bedford set texts).
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY. In addition to your main oral presentation, you are required to produce an annotated bibliography of at least seven secondary sources of critical writings concerning one theoretical approach to either Heart of Darkness or Hamlet. Annotations should summarize, analyze and evaluate the item listed. Use the seventh edition of the MLA Handbook for every aspect of your layout. Use 12-point font and one and a half spaces between lines (even though MLA requires double spaces). Length: four to five pages (maximum). You should cite at least one book, one essay in an anthology, one essay in a scholarly journal, and one electronic source. See “Preparing an Annotated Bibliography” available on Beachboard.
RESEARCH FOR FINAL PAPER. For your longer end-of-term paper by the week before the Spring Recess you will select one of the following texts: The Tempest, The Sun Also Rises, The Great Gatsby, or Mrs Dalloway, and a theory you will be applying to it. You should use the spring recess to research materials needed to analyze your selected text employing a particular theory or theorist encountered in the course (other than the theory you chose for your oral paper). As a preliminary you will produce a typed two-page outline of your final paper for distribution among your fellow students at the time you make your oral presentation of your research during the last two weeks of the semester. The aim of these presentations is a) for you to obtain from the group constructive criticism of your proposed term paper and suggestions for improving it, and b) for the rest of the class to learn from your experience.
FINAL PAPER. The paper itself (in MLA style) will consist of your own interpretation of the work, making conscious use of one theoretical approach studied during the course, and drawing on any relevant published criticism of the work that employs the theoretical approach you have selected or is relevant to your argument (12-13 pages maximum).
Grade Point Computation
See the University Catalog: Regulations – Grades and Grading Procedures for definitions of grades A-F.
- Reaction papers, attendance and participation: 20%
- Annotated Bibliography: 15%.
- Oral presentation paper: 30%.
- Preliminary outline of final paper: 5%
- Final research paper: 30%.
Syllabus
T Jan 20 Project allocations. Introduction to literary studies and modern literary theory.
Th Jan 22 The New Criticism. (Norton: Eliot; Brooks; Wimsatt and Beardsley)
T Jan 27 Application of the New Criticism to either Hamlet or Heart of Darkness.
Th Jan 29 Library Visit: Joseph Aubele. Meet in Room 116, University Library.
T Feb 3 Reader response criticism. (Norton: Iser; Fish).
Th Feb 5 Application of reader response criticism to either Hamlet or Heart of Darkness.
T Feb 10 Marxism. (Norton: Marx and Engels pp. 651-662; Gramsci; Althusser).
Th Feb 12 Application of Marxism to either Hamlet or Heart of Darkness.
T Feb 17 Classic psychoanalytic criticism. (Norton: Freud, except "Fetichism").
Th Feb 19 Saussurean linguistics. (Norton: Saussure).
T Feb 24 Poststructuralist psychoanalytic criticism. (Norton: Lacan except “The Signification of the Phallus”). ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DUE.
Th Feb 26 Application of psychoanalytic criticism to either Hamlet (cf. Adelman) or Heart of Darkness.
T Mar 3 From structuralism to poststructuralism (Norton: Todorov; Barthes).
Th Mar 5 Application of structuralism and semiotics to either Hamlet or Heart of Darkness.
T Mar 10 Poststructuralism: Derrida and deconstruction (Norton: Derrida pp. 1688-1734).
Th Mar 12 Application of deconstruction to either Hamlet (cf. Garber) or Heart of Darkness (cf. Miller).
T Mar 17 Poststructuralism: Foucault, and the New Historicism (Norton: Foucault pp. 1475-1502; Greenblatt).
Th Mar 19 Application of Foucault, the New Historicism to either Hamlet (cf. Coddon) or Heart of Darkness (cf. Thomas).
READ ONLINE ANGELA CARTER’S “THE BLOODY CHAMBER” (STORY) - https://www.uploady.com/#!/download/eeKwnaYsjrx/eYPJD320VpwFb~67
T Mar 24 How to research, structure and write an English research paper (A feminist interpretation of Carter’s story, “The Bloody Chamber”). SELECT FINAL PAPER TOPIC
Th Mar 26 Gender theories: first phase feminism (Norton: Woolf; de Beauvoir)
Mar 30-Apr 5 SPRING RECESS
T Apr 7 Gender theories: poststructuralist and queer theory (Norton: Kristeva; Sedgwick 2464-70; Butler).
Th Apr 9 Application of gender theories to either Hamlet (cf. Showalter) or Heart of Darkness (cf. Smith).
T Apr 14 Postcolonial theory (Norton: Said pp. 1861-88; Spivak).
Th Apr 16 Application of postcolonial theory to Hamlet or Heart of Darkness (cf. Brantlinger).
T Apr 21 Postmodernist theories (Norton: Lyotard; Baudrillard; Jameson pp. 1846- 60)
Th Apr 23 Application of postmodernist theory to any appropriate post World War Two text or cultural phenomenon.
T Apr 28 Presentations of final paper outline.
Th Apr 30 Presentations of final paper outline.
T May 5 Presentations of final paper outline.
Th May 7 Presentations of final paper outline.
Th May 14 Submit final paper in my mailbox in MHB-413 by 5:00 pm.
Useful web sites:
List of works on literary theory:
http://vos.ucsb.edu/browse.asp?id=2718
http://www.kristisiegel.com/theory.htm#newcriticism
MLA formatting:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ (guide to latest MLA style)
Plagiarism
If you use the ideas or words of another writer as if they were your own without giving credit to the other writer you are guilty of plagiarism. Please consult the University Catalog (“Cheating and Plagiarism”) for details of the University’s policy regarding plagiarism. If you are found to have plagiarized another writer’s words you will receive an F for the paper the first time and an F for the course on a repeat occasion.
Campus Technology Help Desk
The CSULB Technology Help Desk in the Horn Center Lobby is available for students. The Help Desk can assist you on a wide range of computer issues including: Operating Systems, CSULB Email Accounts, My CSULB, Beachboard, Remote Connection to CSULB, Microsoft Desktop Applications, Anti-Virus, Internet and Web related topics,. Contact the Help Desk by phone at 562-985-4959, email to helpdesk@csulb.edu or visit them on the web at helpdesk.csulb.edu.
Withdrawal Policy
Students who choose not to complete this course should withdraw officially as soon as possible and inform me. Withdrawals during the first two weeks do not appear on official records. Withdrawals between the third and twelfth weeks must be for “serious and compelling reasons” and require signed approval by me and the department chair. Withdrawals during the final three weeks of instruction are generally permitted only for accident or serious illness. They require signatures from me, the chair, and the Dean of the College, who may require withdrawal from all classes in which the student is enrolled.
Makeup and Attendance Policy
For a definition of “excused absences” see the University Catalog: Regulations – Class Attendance. Excused absences require you to inform me a week in advance of your absence. More than three unexcused absences will result in the lowering of your course grade by a grade point or more depending on the number of such absences. Students who miss exams or fail to meet deadlines for graded papers for what I consider a compelling reason (such as a religious holiday or jury duty) may make up that part of the grade. It is your responsibility to arrange with me an alternative if you miss the deadline for an assignment. If you submit an assignment late without a documented excuse a penalty for lateness will be imposed. A student who misses the final exam or fails to submit a final paper in lieu of a final exam without a documented excuse will probably receive an F or an Incomplete, depending on the circumstances and previous work. |