|
|
DAVID HORNBECK
A Festschrift
Reflections by
Former Students and
Current Colleagues and Associates
|
|
|
CERAMIC WARS: STYLE AND MARKETING
IN MEXICAN CALIFORNIA, 1810-1846
Robert L.Hoover
|
|
INTRODUCTION
The social sciences have been characterized as a series of disciplines
consisting of a framework of irrefutable facts which generate a great deal of
constantly changing interpretation. The final quarter of the twentieth
century saw a major reinterpretation of the culture of Hispanic California.
The milestone publication of Immanuel Wallerstein's first volume on the modern
world system (Wallerstein 1974), research associated with the American
Bicentennary, and interest leading up to the Columbian Quincentennary provided
the impetus for archæologists, geographers, and historians to pursue
in-depth studies of the Spanish and Mexican periods in California in an
interdisciplinary manner (Archibald 1976; Costello 1989; Johnson 1989; Hoover
1989). In the process, the California mission system was revealed as a very
complex and dynamic institution that flexibly adjusted to shifts in politics,
the economy, demography, etc.
David Hornbeck (1989) pioneered studies which, using new information, focused
on the economic changes affecting the California missions. He demonstrated
how changes in technology, population, resources, and cultural attributes
caused the individual missions to morph at different times from rapidly
growing acculturative institutions to stable surplus producing centers that
supported the military and civilian population and finally to gradually
declining settlements relying heavily on technology and external trade for
survival. This final phase, with its concentration on the development of
resources and specialized technology for trade, is exemplified by the attempts
of Missions Santa Inés and La Purisima to mechanize the fulling process
for their woolen textiles (Hoover 1992; 2001). Each mission with suitable
resources specialized in different ways.
California, originally completely dependent on supply ships from Mexico, found
trading patterns disrupted after 1808. In that year, Napoleon occupied Spain
and abducted its king, Carlos IV, and his son, Fernando, placing Joseph
Bonaparte on the throne in their place. Thus began a seven year period of
disruptive warfare, in Spain to expel the French and in Mexico from 1810 for
independence from Spain in 1821. Trade outside the Spanish empire had
traditionally been forbidden (Skowronek 1992), though this restriction was
difficult to enforce among needy Californios. Now California was faced with
an end of supplies from Mexico and salaries for the frontier troops. The
smuggling that had taken place to supply local needs now developed into
full-scale illicit foreign trade, finally legalized by Mexico in 1823.
This was the same period that the effects of the English Industrial Revolution
were flooding the world market with inexpensive mass-produced products that
were rapidly replacing hand-made craft items. It was cheaper and more
efficient to ship factory-made English goods on British and American ships to
places like California than it was to depend on the limited supplies, high
expense, and poor distribution of Mexican sources.
Ceramics have traditionally been useful to historical archæology as time
markers that can be linked to particular periods, social groups and trading
relationships. Recent excavations at several mission sites and a presidio in
California indicate that hand-made Mexican pottery was quite rapidly eclipsed
after 1810 by the mass-produced wares of the Staffordshire potteries and other
centers in Britain. English ceramic forms and designs became quite popular
among all classes during the Mexican period. It is not uncommon to find many
examples from California missions decorated with bucolic scenes of the English
countryside, with identifiable castles, fox hunts, and punting on the river.
The effect on the depressed ceramic industry of Puebla must have been
dramatic. Puebla potters were hampered by several serious handicaps that they
were never able to overcome. Local majolicas were each individually shaped
and hand-painted by skilled craftsmen in the pre-industrial manner (Lister and
Lister 1984). This fact limited production and made each vessel expensive to
produce. An equally important factor was the distance and difficulty of
transport between Puebla and Alta California. There were no secure land
routes, and in any case, pottery did not travel well over the rough roads of
the times. Mexican maritime transport was also poorly developed.
The Staffordshire potteries, on the other hand, had ready access to all
necessary raw materials; industrial scale factories which utilized molds,
lathes (Fig.
1) and transfer printing techniques; and improved kilns which insured
uniform firing temperatures. A regional system of canals provided the
necessary supplies to the potteries and also served as a means of access for
the finished products to the nearby port of Liverpool and the outside world.
British and American shipping dominated overseas trade at that time, making it
possible to deliver pots cheaply and in quantity to most ports of the world.
It is not surprising that British wares dominated world markets for most of
the 19th century.
The Mexican potters of Puebla were not oblivious to this decline in their
business. While they were unable to address the basic problems of
industrialization and transportation, they did take steps to counter the
increasing popularity of English forms and decoration. They made some
interesting attempts to emulate English designs and to make minor innovations
in stylistic type. I propose to discuss these here, first by describing an
English ware and then its Mexican majolica imitator.
|
|
THE POTTERY
A very common type of English ware recovered from Hispanic sites in California
is Feather Edge pearlware, especially in the form of plates. Such plates were
formed by shaping a thick sheet of clay over a wooden mold to create the
vessel form as well as raised embossing around the vessel rim. Feather Edge
Ware generally had a hard white or light blue (due to cobalt) clear lead
glaze. The embossed rim was typically decorated with a rim band of color,
most often cobalt blue but also green, yellow, pink, red, or brown. In the
earlier examples, the rim band was applied as individual brush strokes, over
the embossing, creating a "feathering" effect. On other specimens, the
decorator simply painted a solid colored line quickly with his brush over the
embossed rim. Sometimes the plate edge is smooth; sometimes slightly
scalloped. Such pottery was produced in England between 1785 and 1840.
Puebla potters responded to this popular style with two types of majolica.
Huejotzingo Blue-on-White continued the venerable Puebla Blue-on-White
Tradition, itself inspired in the later 17th century by the designs and colors
of Chinese blue-on-white porcelain. Huejotzingo was normally decorated with
only a single encircling rim band of cobalt blue. The remainder of the vessel
was plain, in contrast to the earlier floral and animal designs of the larger
tradition. This plainness may reflect a new preference for simple English
neoclassical designs. If one accepts this interpretation, Heujotzingo should
be confined to the very late Spanish and Mexican periods to correspond to the
firm dates of Feather Edge Ware. Heujotzingo also includes green (Fig.
2) and yellow variants, as well as the more frequent blue.
An interesting variant has been noted at the Presidio of Santa Barbara,
Mission La Purisima, and in Spanish Florida. These were basically Huejotzingo
Blue-on-White sopero plates with the addition of several circular bands around
a central medallion containing the inscription? "Viva Fernando VII",
commemorating the restoration of the Spanish monarchy after the final fall of
Napoleon in 1815 (Fig.
3). More elaborate figures and decorations with the same phrase have been
noted in Mexico City collections. Since this phrase would hardly have been
used in Mexican territory after 1821, we can date these examples firmly to
1815-21. Perhaps produced by government order or by a patriotic patron, these
specimens were widely and briefly distributed in Spanish territories, and are
examples of early political "spin." With the exception of labels on storage
jars, albarelos, Hispanic ceramics seldom contained inscriptions. This was in
sharp contrast to the English practice, in which? pot inscriptions frequently
commemorated specific events.
Wavy Rim Blue-on-White (Fig.
4), also part of the Puebla Blue-on-White Tradition, was made in soup
plate form. Like the Huejotzingo type, they were generally plain except for a
single rim band, in this case undulating or scalloped. Wavy Rim pottery was
also found in a green variety. The type should again be placed in the very
late Spanish and Mexican periods to correspond to the dates of Feather Edge
Ware.
Dipped Ware is a broad general term for British utilitarian earthenware
vessels turned on horizontal lathes and decorated with colored slips in the
late 18th and 19th centuries. The earliest varieties were decorated with
variegated "geological" surfaces or by geometric patterns created on rose and
crown engine-turning lathes. By the 1790s, mocha decoration appeared,
consisting of dendritic patterns formed by the reaction of an acidic coloring
agent to the alkaline wet slip surface. In the 19th century, further designs,
such as "cat's eye," "common cable," "dipped fan," and "twig" were developed,
many with the use of a special three-chambered slip cup (Carpenter and Rickard
2001) (Fig.
5). Large quantities were shipped to North America as bowls, mugs, and
jugs (Fig.
6 and Fig.
7). Since neither the lathe nor the triple slip cup were available to
Mexican potters, there are no Hispanic equivalents.
Transferwares appeared in England in the 1770s and became extremely popular
throughout the 19th century and into the 20th century. An engraved copper
plate containing intricate designs was used to print a design on tissue paper,
which then transferred the wet ink to the ceramic surface. The design could
be either placed under or over the glaze. Transfer printing eclipsed hand
painting, a much more laborious and costly process. No Hispanic equivalents
existed.
Flow Blue is a type of stoneware, or rarely porcelain, that originated in the
Staffordshire potteries in the 1820s. Most examples contained transfer
printed designs, though some were hand painted. The blue glaze blurred or
"flowed" around the design during firing.
Cohen-Williams (1992:128) has identified a majolica known as Guanajuato Flown
(sic) Blue, which was produced in the late 19th century in Mexico. Its
diffuse designs are clearly imitations of English Flow Blue. I have not seen
examples of this type in California, as the Hispanic era had ended there.
Soperos, platos, and tazas? have been found with this design. I am uncertain
how successful the Guanajuato potters were in copying Flow Blue, but in any
case these majolicas had unimproved earthenware bodies.
|
|
SUMMARY
The results of several excavations at mission sites in California indicate
that Mexican hand-made pottery was largely replaced between 1810 and 1825 by
mass-produced English wares. This represents a clear reflection of the shift
postulated by Hornbeck in the mission economy from one of dependent
subsistence to one of specialized trading. Mexican potters made efforts to
regain the ceramic market by means of adjusting pottery decoration to current
tastes. However, they were ultimately unsuccessful. Not only was the Mexican
ceramic market no longer shielded by protectionist laws after 1823, but both
land and water transport were poorly developed by Mexico. Most importantly,
Mexico would not develop the industrial capabilities for mechanized production
until the end of the 19th century during the Porfiriato.
|
|
REFERENCES
-
Archibald, Robert. 1978. The Economic Aspects of the California Missions.
Academy of American Franciscan History, Washington.
-
Carpentier, Donald, and Rickard, Johnathan. 2001. Slip decoration in the Age
of Industrialization. Ceramics in America. Chipstone Foundation,
Milwaukee.
-
Cohen-Willaims, Anita. 1992. Common majolica types of Northern New Spain.
Historical Archaeology 26, 1: 119-130.
-
Costello, Julia G. 1989. Variability among Alta California missions: The
economics of agricultural production. Columbian Consequences, Vol. ?1:
Archaeological and Historical Perspectives on the Spanish Borderlands
West, pp. 435-449. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
-
Hoover, Robert L. 1989. Spanish-Native interaction and acculturation in the
Alta California missions. Columbian Consequences,Vol. 1: Archaeological and
Historical Perspectives on the Spanish Borderlands West, pp. 395-405.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
-
________. 1992. Excavations at the Santa Inés Mills complex.
Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 28, 2: 48-66.
-
________. 2001. Excavations at the Mystery Column: The possible remains of
a wind-powered wool fulling post mill in La Purisima?Mission State Historic
Park. Pacific Coast Archaeological?Society Quarterly 37, 1: 37-59.?
-
Hornbeck, David. 1989. Economic growth and change at the missions of Alta
California, 1769-1846. Columbian Consequences, Vol. 1: Archaeological and
Historical Perspectives on the Spanish Borderlands West, pp. 423-433.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
-
Johnson, John R. 1989. The Chumash and the missions. Columbian
Consequences, Vol. 1:? Archaeological and Historical Perspectives on the
Spanish Borderlands West, pp. 365-375. Washington, DC: Smithsonian
Institution Press.
-
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World System I: Capitalist
Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the 16th
Century.? New York: Academic Press.
|
|
This document is maintained by C.M.
Rodrigue
First placed on the web: 05/02/09
Last Updated: 05/02/09
|