Floods

Flooding has been one of the most studied of natural hazards for a long time, and it was the target of the first social science studies of hazards (Gilbert White's work in the 1930s). Many of the themes in hazards research were first developed in connection with floods, such as:

Definition: physically, flooding occurs when water reaches and tops some height above a given benchmark point, posing a threat to life or property caused by rising or spilling water

Types:

Physical dynamics of riverine flooding

These affect the floodplain, a strip of relatively smooth land bordering a stream, built of sediment carried by the stream (alluvium), and overflowed regularly in times of high water

Riverine flooding occurs in the context of the drainage basin or catchment or watershed (different names for roughly the same concept)

Runoff is the amount of discharge from a watershed, channeled through the highest order stream at the base of the drainage basin. Many factors affect runoff:

Concept of discharge

Recurrence interval is an important hazards concept and it was developed early to visualize flood hazard.

  • Very tricky concept

  • Think about the "100 year flood":

    • Does this mean we can expect (just) one every century?

    • No, it's just the magnitude of a flood that has a 1 percent probability of happening in any given year (independently of any other years) and, thus, a probable average recurrence interval of 100 years.

  • Equation for recurrence Interval: I = (n + 1)/r

    • I = recurrence Interval

    • n = number of events in a series for which you have data

    • r = rank of an event

  • Plot complication: We often don't have 100 years of data

    • Extrapolation is used:

      • Graph your data series

      • Fit a curve to describe it best

      • Extend the curve to the 100 year level

    • Problem: It is really not statistically valid to extrapolate beyond your data (but it's the best we have, a "beggars can't be choosers" situation)

  • The probability (p) of a flood of a given recurrence interval (I) being equaled or topped in the next whatever years (n) is given by:

    • p = 1/I

    • probability is 1 divided by recurrence Interval

Magnitude and frequency relationship is expressed by the concept of recurrence intervals and probabilities

  • The lower the magnitude level, the more frequently it will be matched or topped

  • The greater the magnitude level, the less frequently it will be equaled or exceeded

Cascades of Secondary Effects: Flooding can create a variety of secondary effects that can deepen a disaster.

  • People (and vehicles carrying them) can be dragged off and drown or be struck unconscious by debris in the water or be pinned underwater.

  • Flooded homes can then be invaded by mildew and mold, which are themselves very potent hazards to health (and the cost of repair can be staggering).

  • Topsoil can be dragged off (or buried by debris), damaging agricultural land.

  • Crops will be destroyed, and this can create severe economic trauma for farmers and, in the poorest areas, can result in famine.

  • Livestock will die from drowning, hypothermia, or starvation, which can be a very substantial economic (and emotional) loss for farm families.

  • Flood waters can be contaminated by any sort of chemicals, as storage tanks are pushed off their moorings, float off, and smash into objects that can rupture them, including containers of other chemicals (with mystery chemical soups the result).

  • Electrical and other lifelines may fail, sometimes causing electrocution hazards or, ironically, large fires.

  • Drinking water may become scarce as potable water sources become compromised by floodwaters or the secondary effects of flooding.

  • Depending on local conditions, floodwaters can trigger epidemics of such water-borne diseases as cholera, typhoid deber, and hepatitis A and such vector-borne diseases as malaria, dengue, yellow fever, and West Nile Fever.

FIRMs (Flood Insurance Rate Maps)

  • Developed by FEMA for our National Flood Insurance Program to delineate flood hazard zones for insurance purposes.

  • 100 year flood is used as a baseline, which represents a compromise between greater levels of protection (precautionary principle, avoiding a Type II error) and the rapidly escalating costs for protection much beyond that level (de minimis principle, avoiding a Type I error)

  • Designations:

    • A (and its various subtypes) mean a high risk zone, one with a 1% chance of flooding each year or a 26% chance of flooding during a 30 year mortgage

    • V (and its subtypes) mean the same thing, but in coastal contexts

    • B means a moderate flood zone, estimated to lie above the 100 year (1% annual) flood zone but within reach of the 500 year (0.2%) flood. It can also mean areas that can experience shallow (< 1 ft.) flooding or areas theoretically protected from the 100 year flood by levées

    • C means minimal flood hazard areas, usually above the reach of the 500 year flood, though there may be localized shallow ponding of water

    • X is another designation for areas that are like zones B and C -- out of reach of the 500 year flood or protected by levées from the 100 year flood

    • D are the unstudied zones

  • FEMA's Map Service Center can generate a "FIRMette" for yourself by entering addresses at http://msc.fema.gov/.

Social dynamics

Why do people live in floodplains?

  • Farming

    • Alluvium and the soil fertility it has created for agriculture

    • Access to irrigation water

  • Fishing

  • Transportation

    • Cheapness of water shipping

    • Flatness and ease of land transportation (trucking, rail)

  • Flat surface, which is easy and cheap to build on, too

  • Power source

  • Scenic ("home with a view")

Environmental perception issues

  • Many individuals are unaware (or unreceptive to learning) of their risk

    • There are, after all, good reasons to be on the floodplain

    • To admit hazard creates cognitive dissonance, that uncomfortable sensation created when you try to hold two mutually incompatible thoughts in your head at the same time ("it's risky here!" versus "I need to stay here because of my farm, my job, my family, my gorgeous home, whatever")

    • A common response to reduce cognitive dissonance is denial

    • Sometimes legitimating denial is anti-government sentiment ("who do they think they are? telling me what I can do with my own land?")

  • Accurate risk perception is increased by recent experience with floods.

  • It is also improved by detailed scenario information coming consistently from a variety of trusted sources

  • Some people whose denial has been broken will actively seek information, and that transition to information-seeking behavior becomes an opportunity for scientists, planners, and emergency personnel to share information about the hazard, how to mitigate against it, how to prepare for it, or start working on getting away from it

Mitigations and adjustments to flood hazard

  • Individual or household level adjustments and mitigations include avoidance, structural mitigations, and non-structural mitigations.
    • Avoiding high hazard locations

      • Would-be home-buyers really need to expend a little effort on due diligence and the Internet makes this fairly easy to do, and it should be done before viewing homes and before "falling in love" with a particular home

      • Moving out of them is an option for the individual household that may be cost-effective in the long run (and life-conserving!), but that presumes a willing, if ignorant or careless, buyer -- or a FEMA flood buyout program when you need it --

        https://https://www.fema.gov/node/454190

    • Structural mitigation options:

      • Raised foundations

        • Reasonably cheap mitigation to add in new construction

        • Often prohibitively expensive as retrofits

      • Moatlike flood walls, expensive but not quite as bad as raising the foundation

    • Individual non-structural mitigations and preparations are possible, too:

      • Working out an emergency plan and, ideally, coördinating with neighbors and other community members for sandbagging, emergency housing, communication, and the like

      • Insurance

        • Costly, and this may be one major source of denial

        • Odd effect (Alan Sorkin's work) -- if the premia do not cover the cost of an insurer's exposure, insurance may actually raise population density on scenic floodplains (this was discussed earlier in the semester)

        • After 1994, the US has a mandatory flood insurance program for those located in Special Flood Hazard Areas (Zone A and all its subtypes), if there are any Federal guarantees for the mortgages. This should help raise consciousness of the risks in Zone A, make people think a little more carefully about where they buy, and also generate a larger insurance base to cover losses in Zone A.

    • Fatalistically accepting vulnerability to loss is an option for adjustment, too, one daily practiced by all kinds of people, sometimes under the influence of fatalistic or predeterministic religious views, sometimes for lack of resources to do anything about it: Hope for the best while resigned to the worst.

    Societal level mitigations:

    • Structural mitigations:

      • Dams

      • Levées

      • Dykes along coast or structures like the Thames Barrier in London

      • Dredging and removal of obstacles to natural flood or human-made channels

      • Sandbagging in predisaster and disaster phases

    • Structural mitigation against small recurrent hazards in this way may increase overall social vulnerability to larger, rarer events by creating a false sense of security, which leads to more people and assets at risk on the floodplain, which creates vulnerability for them and for the rest of society, too:

      • Costs of the mitigations, which are distributed across society to allow a few to act on environmental dysfunctional impulses

      • Cost of response, recovery, reconstruction

      • Various negative (and perversely positive) effects on economy (one household's loss can be a small business' gain in selling necessary goods and services to the stricken)

      • This has been one of the critical hazards insights that emerged from flood analyses and then was extended to other hazards:

        • Society tends to adjust to low-magnitude recurrent hazards in such a way as to set itself up for a much bigger magnitude but much rarer incident later on.

        • We've seen this again in chaparral fire hazard (does successful firefighting lead to worse fire hazard later, or does it help offset the increase in human ignition activities?)

    • Societal level non-structural mitigations

      • Land use zoning as a means of encouraging individuals, households, and businesses to avoid high risk zones (can generate political resistance as a "taking," however)

      • Buyout programs (very cost effective, according to FEMA, see link above)

      • Mandatory insurance programs (discussed above)

      • Warning systems of varying intensity, scaling up in urgency and specificity

        • Here's a rather nice one from East Anglia in England, which illustrates that progression:

          • Flood alerts

            • About 12 hours

            • Flooding is a possibility

          • Flood danger

            • About 4 hours

            • Flooding is probable

          • Flood arousal

            • Flooding is imminent

            • Emergency services on alert and equipment positioned

            • Repair and maintenance people for equipment called in

            • Loudspeaker vans on standby

          • Flood alarm

            • Emergency phase initiation

            • Civilian organizations and government coördinate, as in delivery of warnings or helping in evacuation

            • Military, however, acts on its own under its own separate authority

        • Another flood warning system (USNWS flash floods in the American Southwest), showing that idea of scaling up, but with less elaboration than the British system, partly because of the nature of Western flash floods

          • Flash flood watch: possible that rains will cause them in scattered locations

          • Flash flood warning, issued through radio and TV broadcasts and even through loudspeakers:

            • They are occurring or are imminent in a small area that is now defined

            • Drop everything and get to safe ground immediately

Socioeconomic vulnerability patterns vary, as they do with so many hazards, having to do with occupations and differential access to resources:

  • Farmers, farmworkers, and farms at risk

    • Even in the developed West, farmers and farmworkers are often highly vulnerable simply because of the dependency of farms on water-accessible locations

    • In the poorer countries that are aspiring to develop economically, farmers are often the poorest people in society with the fewest resources to learn about impending danger, do much about it, or recover from the damages.

      • Crops and animals are destroyed

      • Soil may be washed away or polluted

      • Agricultural supplies and equipment are destroyed

      • Seed supplies may be destroyed and preclude planting

      • Deaths in the family may make it very hard to muster the labor needed to resume farming; grief alone can make resuming work very difficult

      • Floods can set off a destructive cycle of debt, from which many households can never free themselves

  • In the richer countries, amenity migrants may be at heightened risk (though perhaps not vulnerable to the extent of their risk through various government and insurance resources and their own wealth) -- this is a dynamic similar to California's wildfire-urban interface (WUI) situation and the increasing settlement of the "hurricane coast."

  • The economy as a whole is susceptible to shocks from floods, including agricultural and industrial disruptions and resulting declines in transportation. It should be noted that, while floods are horrendous problems for most people in floodplains and can set them back financially, even for the rest of their lives, some people will benefit by being able to sell goods and services necessary for others to rebuild their lives. Sometimes, this entails gouging; but many times it is quite innocent and necessary. If you work in construction or a big-box home supply store, for example, you will simply be very busy after a disaster. People in first response work may even be able to earn overtime during a flood disaster. So, overall economic effects will be negative, but there will be offsetting economic gains in particular sectors, places, and times.


==========
Dr. Rodrigue's Home |   Geography Home |   EMER Home |   ES&P Home
BeachBoard |   CSULB Home |   Library |   Bookstore
==========

Document maintained by Dr. Rodrigue
Last revision: 10/18/20

==========