[ image of Mars ]       

Geography of Mars

Lecture Notes

Christine M. Rodrigue, Ph.D.

Department of Geography
California State University
Long Beach, CA 90840-1101
1 (562) 985-4895
rodrigue@csulb.edu
https://home.csulb.edu/~rodrigue/

Lecture Notes for the Final

  • Human-environment interaction: Mars of the imagination

    • Science fiction imagines Mars:

      • Science fiction has rather a long history in literature:
        • Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: or, the Modern Prometheus of 1818, the first example of modern science fiction, which tells the story of a disastrous outcome of a scientific experiment.
        • Voltaire wrote a short story in 1752 called "Micromégas," which entailed the visit to Earth by two enormous aliens, one from Sirius and the other from Saturn, after deciding not to stop at Mars because it was too small for them, but the reference to Mars includes a comment that it had two small moons (which would not be discovered until 1877!). You can read it here, if you're curious about Voltaire's short foray into science fiction/fantasy: http://www.accuracyproject.org/t-Voltaire- Micromegas.html.
        • Some themes in science fiction, such as visits to alien planets, go back as far as the True History of Lucian of Samosata back in the 2nd century, though, as with Voltaire's "Micromégas," there's no attempt to incorporate a scientist or a scientific outlook. You can read that story online, too: http://www.lucianofsamosata.info/TheTrueHistory.html. You may enjoy his smart-aleck and rather modern sensibility!
        • Mars became a focus of Victorian science fiction:
          • The findings of the Geographic Era caught the imagination of the reading public.
          • The earliest novel set on Mars was Percy Greg's Across the Zodiac: The Story of a Wrecked Record (1880), which presented the first use of the word, "astronaut" (referring to the spaceship), the concept of anti-gravity propulsion ("apergy"), Mars confidently described with seas, clouds, thin but breathable air, and a martian society clearly drawn to rant about quirks of human society! You can read it here: http://www.fullbooks.com/Across-the-Zodiac.html (optional -- beach reading in the summer?).
          • Something that made Mars, specifically, of great interest among all the planets was Schiaparelli's canali and Lowell's promulgation of the canals craze, which led to the vision of Mars as a dying, drying planet, occupied by an intelligent species trying to prolong its existence by heroic hydraulic engineering.
          • The poignancy of this imaginative scenario flavors Earth-focussed theories about the beginnings of the Neolithic Revolution in a similar process of desiccation in the Middle East, leading to irrigation and domestication.
            • It seems the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were receptive to notions of the fall of civilizations, both on Earth and on Mars.
            • This might have had to do with the growing scientific realization that there had been drastic climate change on Earth, e.g.,
              • Louis Agassiz's work on the Pleistocene ice ages starting in the 1840s
              • Henri Schirmer's 1893 work suggesting the Sahara had progressively dried up
              • Raphael Pumpelly's proposal in 1908 that domestication occurred when the Middle East dried up after the pluvials believed co-eval with the European glaciations and forced plants, animals, and people together on fewer and fewer oases.
          • It didn't take long for fiction authors to incorporate the theme of a desert Mars, a dying hydraulic civilization, and an excitingly exotic locale that had the thin veneer of scientific credibility, in the light of the scholarly discourses of the day.

      • Themes pursued in martian science fiction and fantasy:
        • Space opera: adventures of a (nearly always male) hero, featuring almost cartoon-like evil characters, lots of fighting often against the kinds of odds that only a mythical hero could (im)possibly overcome (swords, guns, exotic weapons, such as stun guns, death rays, dematerializers), evocations of exotic society but without much attention to their sociology and psychology, descriptions of wondrous physical and cultural landscapes, and, sometimes, a damsel-in-distress love interest (very chaste and Puritan in the early decades of science fiction, sometimes more erotic in contemporary space opera). In some cases, space opera resembles classic Western movies but in a martian or outer space setting. Contemporary space opera is generally set in the space between the stars (e.g., Star Wars, Star Trek), while the earliest space opera often picked Mars as a destination far enough out and little enough known to be an almost plausible exotic setting.
          • Edgar Rice Burroughs' John Carter (Barsoom) series from 1912 to 1943 (here's the trailer for the 2012 movie: http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi2340397337
          • Garrett Putnam Serviss' Edison's Conquest of Mars (1898), written by an astronomer trying his hand at science fiction and doing so well with it he later became a professional, full-time science fiction author. You can read it here: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/19141.
        • Xenophobia: the Martians are hostile to us and want to invade us and take over our beautiful planet. There are all sorts of explorations of this fearful Other in science fiction ("Independence Day"), including that dealing with Mars and Martians (right down to Marvin the Martian in the Bugs Bunny cartoons!). This strand in science fiction seems to draw on the psychological substratum powering recurrent anti-immigrant sentiment in the US and many other countries. It is sometimes coupled with a more beneficent representation about how confronting the truly Hostile Other brings squabbling humankind together, kind of the kumbaya counter-narrative (e.g., the movie, "Independence Day").
          • H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds (and the Orson Wells radio broadcast, the 1950s movie, and the Tom Cruise edition a few years back). Here's the trailer to the 1951 movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046534/
          • "Mars Attacks!" (1996)
          • "Cowboys and Aliens" (2011)
        • Hard science fiction: This is fiction set in the near future, focussing on extrapolations of technologies and scientific knowledge available at the time of writing. Characterization is usually more nuanced than in space opera, as is extrapolation of contemporary social structures and politics. Sometimes the author is a scientist moonlighting in the creative arts, so the science of the day shows that training and the aversion to bringing in supernatural fantasy elements may reflect a scientist's temperament. This genre evolves with the science of the author's day, so the hard science fiction of the 1950s may seem almost quaint or comical when judged by contemporary science, as, indeed, contemporary hard science fiction will quickly show its age. To enjoy the older variants, you need to make a double suspension of belief, not just the suspension any fiction requires but a second suspension of the inner critic of the science gotten so wrong. I think it is fair to judge it by how well it extrapolates from and is grounded in the science of the time it was written.
          • Arthur C. Clarke's The Sands of Mars (1951)
          • Kim Stanley Robinson's trilogy: Red Mars, Green Mars, and Blue Mars (1993, 1995, 1997)
          • Gregory Benford The Martian Race (1999)
          • Robert Zubrin How to Live on Mars (2008)
          • Andy Weir's The Martian: A Novel (2011)
        • Soft science fiction: This is fiction set in the near or distant future, generally with a grounding in contemporary science and technology extrapolated into the time of the story. The focus, however, is on anthropology, social structure, politics, and psychology, and characterization is often intricate and engaging. The intent is to sketch out alternative ways of organizing human society in the here and now and draw out their implications. Sometimes the tenor is utopian; other times dystopian. The social issue of interest to the author will vary drastically, depending on the author's agenda of exploration.
          • "Two Women of the West" Unveiling a Parallel (feminist science fiction from 1893, set on Mars). Available on Project Gutenberg: http://gutenberg.org/files/42816/42816-h/42816-h.html
          • Alexander Bogdanov's 1905 Red Star (Soviet science fiction written before the success of the Russian Revolution)
          • Kurd Laßwitz: Two Planets (1897)
          • Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles (1950)
          • Robert A. Heinlein: Stranger in a Strange Land (1961)
          • Philip José Farmer's Jesus on Mars (1979)
          • Maybe "Mars Needs Moms" fits in here, a rather underappreciated film! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1305591/
        • Science fiction fantasy: May or may not build a world that is a credible extrapolation of the author's time. It incorporates elements that are metaphysical, occult, or supernatural and may really bend timelines, often playing with the themes of alternative timelines or time travel and its paradoxes.
          • The Doctor Who special "The Waters of Mars" (2009)
          • M.E. Brines The Queen's Martian Rifles (2011)
      • Dead, dry Mars and its effect on science fiction
        • The Mariner 4, 6, and 7 flyby missions brought back imagery that showed a crater-battered ancient surface that looked, at first, much like the Moon: No canals, no flowing water, bone-dry, dead.
        • The Mariner 9 and Viking orbiters and landers confirmed the impression of a planet long since dead and now completely unsuitable for life but also possessed of spectacular landscapes on a scale unimagined on Earth:
          • Planet-covering dust storm on the arrival of Mariner 9
          • Olympus Mons and the other gigantic volcanoes of Mars emerging as the 1971 dust storm abated and the dust settled down.
          • Valles Marineris emerging from the dust as a gash utterly dwarfing the "Grand" Canyon.
          • Intriguing, if ancient, dendritic drainage networks
        • The Viking landers biological chemistry experiments did provoke reactions, but those reactions turned out to have possible abiotic explanations, which is far and away the consensus interpretation: Mars is singularly inhospitable to "life as we know it, Jim" -- indeed, a sterile dead world that may have had more water a long, long, long time ago, which it then lost.
        • The impact of these missions on the popular conception of Mars was tremendous. This was the sudden end to any lingering fantasy the public had about canals and romantically desiccating civilizations. The scientific community had known Mars had a thin atmosphere, comprised of gasses we can't breathe, no canals, no possible civilization for decades, since the advent of remote sensing and spectroscopy. Lowell and Tesla and others kept alive the hope that there was someone there, at least in the public's perceptions, and that public image is what informed decades of science fiction. The drying planet with its canal building civilization was a trope of science fiction well into the 1960s (e.g., the 1950s-era "War of the Worlds" draws on that in the opening sequence). Indeed, the 1996 "Mars Attacks!" opening sequence has a nod to that, too.
        • The new, dead, dry Mars then had to be worked into somewhat plausible science fiction, which was dutifully done. The New Mars is the setting for stories about colonizing Mars and maybe terraforming it, not about interacting with Martians.
        • Indeed, as Dr. Parker noted in his talk in the Spring 2012 Mars class, it's possible that the Viking lander experiments, which failed to find unequivocal evidence for even microbial life, may have set Mars missions back for decades. There was a hiatus in American missions to Mars from 1976 to 1992 (NASA Mars Observer, which failed) and then until the Mars Pathfinder/Sojourner lander/rover combination in 1997.

    • Popular crazes about Mars that spin off from scientific mistakes:
      • Canals on Mars
        • As you remember from the midterm notes on the history of Mars exploration, light and dark variations had been repeatably observed on Mars as far back as 1659 (Huygens' drawing of Syrtis Major).
        • Jesuit monk Angelo Secchi drew a map of light and dark areas in 1863 and is believed to be the first person to use the Italian term, "canali," for the darker areas.
        • Giovanni Sciaparelli, a professional astronomer in Italy, used the excellent 1877 opposition to map light and dark patterns on Mars pretty systematically, giving a lot of them names we use even today. As you remember, he mapped lineations, which he also called "canali."
        • Translation is an inexact art, and his maps came into the English-speaking world showing "canals," rather than "channels."
        • Percival Lowell, himself a prominent amateur astronomer and rich patron of astronomy, took the canals far more literally than Sciaparelli could have imagined.
          • At the time of his first book in 1895, he was still within the bounds of speculation in the scientific community to raise the issue of canals.
          • While science is tolerant of new ideas, it expects them to be treated as hypotheses to be tested against data.
          • Powell erred in going way past the available data, becoming convinced of his interpolations, and parting company with science by not being willing to change his mind when observational data began to undermine his ideas: He would not and could not let go.
          • He marked his increasing alienation from science by turning to the public and shunning the peer-review process, essentially becoming a pseudoscientist.
          • The result of leaving peer-review behind and arousing public interest with his books and talks was an enduring popular craze, one that ignited decades of science fiction based on a drying, dying Mars, clear up to the Mariner era.
          • In other words, like Percival Lowell himself, the popular craze (and literary trend) was (were) unaffected by the improving telescopy, remote sensing, and spectroscopic evidence for an intensely cold Mars with a very tenuous atmosphere that could not support water in canals, civilized or otherwise.
          • The canals craze, then, had its origins in scientific speculation but then became completely unmoored from science.
      • Radio communications from Mars
        • Nikola Tesla was the inventor of Alternating Current, various systems for wireless (radio) communication (possibly with higher claim to inventing radio than Marconi), X-ray generators, robotics and the electronic logic gate that underlies computing. He claimed that he had picked up unusual radio signals (clicks in groups of 1-4) that he thought had come from Mars or maybe Venus and might represent intelligent communication. You can read an article he wrote in 1091 about the episode for Collier's Weekly here: http://earlyradiohistory.us/1901talk.htm.
        • This is another idea that has fueled a minor craze (but nothing on the scale of the Lowell canals craze).
        • Tesla's great rival in the invention of the radio, Guglielmo Marconi, claimed that he received anomalous radio transmissions in 1921, but he didn't say anything about Mars specifically.
        • In 1924, David Todd at Amherst College, persuaded the US government to request all governments to shut off all radio broadcasts for 5 minutes each hour for 24 hours when Earth was nearest Mars: National Radio Silence Day. An elaborate system of radio imagers and film reels were set up to record every incoming radio signal. Sixteen reels had pulsed signals in clusters, separated by 30 second pauses. Like Tesla's signals, these might have been from the then unknown quasar phenomenon in the outer fringes of the detectable universe.
        • There are occasional blips of people claiming to be in radio communication with someone on Mars or deep space, most recently Gregory Hodowanec in the 1980s.
        • Radio communication with Mars (or elsewhere) is another of these persistent crazes that started from a scientific observation that takes on a popular life of its own.
      • The latest craze: The Face on Mars
        • Like the others, this craze started out from a scientific observation.
          • The Viking 1 orbiter was being used to scout for a good potential landing spot for the Viking 2 lander (back then, location analysis was done nearly in real time!).
          • The "Face" popped up in imagery of Cydonia Mensæ, where northern Arabia Terra transitions into the Northern Lowlands in a series of mesas.
          • People at JPL passed the image around, commenting that it looked like a face.
          • Someone issued a press release, which you can see here: http://www.msss.com/education/facepage/pio.html, sharing the image with the public and commenting that it resembled a human head.
        • And we were off and running: A smart aleck comment on Lab, followed by a press release intended to engage the public ... did!
        • One of the people to run off with this is Richard Hoagland.
          • Early in his career, he had ties to space science:
            • curating a space science program for a small science museum in western Massachusetts
            • serving as assistant director for another one in Connecticut
            • working as a consultant to CBS News during the Apollo Program
            • consulting for NASA Goddard Space Flight Center on public communications about an Earth science observation program
          • He grabbed onto the Face on Mars and wrote a book, Monuments of Mars: A City on the Edge of Forever, which argued that the mesa is, in fact, a human face and the mensæ nearby have various mathematical ratios in shapes and angles you get by connecting them with lines.
          • This was not well-received by NASA, and it has cost Mars Global Surveyor and the Mars Orbiter Camera teams a lot of time and money to get higher resolution images of the mensa to satisfy the public interest and silence the conspiracy theorists, instead of pursuing their science objectives.
          • Such chilly responses have annoyed Hoagland into claiming that NASA is part of conspiracies to hide and classify evidence of alien civilizations on Mars and elsewhere, that Phobos is artificial, and other conspiracies having to do with secret worship of Egyptian deities.
          • I can't do justice to it all. Grab some popcorn and visit his web site: http://www.enterprisemission.com/.
          • People who, like Hoagland, are really into this are unswayed by the more detailed imagery that the Malin Space Science Systems group half killed themselves to get ("of course, they altered the image to make it LOOK that way."), even when ESA's Mars Express later took equally devastating images of this feature.
          • Here's NASA's comments on the whole thing: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at- nasa/2001/ast24may_1/.
      • Late breaking news: Nuclear war on Mars
        • The person who proposed that perhaps Mars had experienced a natural nuclear reactor similar to the one that developed on Earth about 2 Ga in the African state of Gabon, the Oklo natural reactor, John E. Brandenburg, has a long history of serious publication in peer-refereed journals about such topics as the carbonaceous chondrites and Mars (Geophysical Research Letters 1996)), the physics of plasmas (IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 1998), cratering rates on Mars (Earth, Moon, and Planets 1995), and the possibility that Mars had had an ocean (Geophysical Research Letters 1986).
        • Since his natural reactor paper at LPSC in 2011, he's followed Lowell's transition away from refereed science into a variety of speculations about interstellar alien races wiping out Mars civilization with nuclear weapons, trying to prove that the Face on Mars is an alien artifact, that the aliens may come back and nuke us here on Earth, and completing Einstein's theory... He's appearing on Coast to Coast and biblical media and, essentially, trying to start a new craze. The way the usual suspects on the Internet are reacting, he may be succeeding at this.
        • I am quite baffled at what would make someone like this go right over the edge of the world late in his career.
  • [ orthographic image of Mars on a black background ] [ Olympus Mons seen at oblique angle that gives a 3-d sense ] [ Mars explorer ]

    Mars Home | Dr. Rodrigue's Home | Geography Home | ES&P Home | EMER Home | NASA Mars

    Scientific Calculator | CSULB Home | My CSULB | BeachBoard | Campus Search | Library

    This document is maintained by Dr. Rodrigue
    First placed online: 01/15/07
    Last updated: 04/26/16