IV. Map symbolism has become pretty standardized through the centuries, so that even foreign maps are not all that hard to read. The important requirement for map symbols is that they be readily recognizable and suited to the scale of the map. We can group map symbolization into three major categories: pictorial symbols, colors symbolism, and value symbols. A. Pictorial symbols involve using neat little pictures to express what is found at a particular place on a map, such as a building, a well or spring, or a mine (these are such small entities that only a relatively large scale map would bother including them). The United States Geological Survey (USGS) puts out all sorts of beautiful and communicative maps, and their pictorial symbols are typical of the sort. I am going to send you to two large files at the links below, which are the left and right side of the key to pictorial symbols that the USGS uses. Make sure to have a look at both of them to get an idea of common symbols: Left side of key Right side of key B. Color symbolism has settled into pretty common usage. 1. Blue is used to show water features: rivers, springs, lakes, playas, oceans, reservoirs, canals. 2. Green is used to represent vegetation (both natural and human- maintained): forests, marshes, scrublands, orchards, vineyards. 3. Brown is often used to show topography or terrain. 4. Black is used to show human artifacts, such as individual buildings, including schools, churches, cemeteries, homes, outbuildings, railroads, pipelines, power lines, oil wells, and tanks. 5. Red is also used to show many larger human artifacts, such as highways, roads, townships, and urban built-up areas on relatively smaller scale maps where it wouldn't make sense to show every building. 6. The USGS also uses purple to show the same things that would normally be shown in red when they revise a map, in order to highlight changes since the last time they revised it. So, you can see how Southern California has grown over the last few decades by looking at all that purple! Here's a map showing some of these for Iowa City, IO. Note the elevation contours, the red areas for older urbanization, and the purple areas showing more recent urbanization: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/united_states/iowa_city_io_1983.jpg C. Value symbols not only identify something and show its location, they also tell us something about the amount of that something in that location. The need to represent values as they change across space has led to a variety of different map types: 1. Dot maps tell you how much of something is found somewhere through concentrations of dots. Each dot might stand for one individual or one case, or it could stand for multiples (e.g., each dot stands for 10 hectares planted in wheat; each dot stands for 1,000 head of cattle). Usually, only one distribution is shown as dots against a skeletal location map. Sometimes, you may see two distributions, shown by different colored dots, on a simple location map. Here is a simple dot map of EPA Superfund cleanup sites in the U.S.: http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/land/ Here's a dot map of zebra mussel sightings (zebra mussel is a very problematic invasive exotic species of shellfish that originated in the Black Sea, the Caspian Sea, and Lake Aral. It has created ecological mayhem in the American Great Lakes and clogs water supply pipes for hydroelectric ... and nuclear power plants. This critter is major bad news). The map shows two kinds of patterns. The known aquatic distribution in the Great Lakes and the Mississippi and St. Laurence drainages is shown with red dots. The dryland sightings (mainly larvae attached to boat hulls that were being driven across country) are shown with yellow stars: http://nas.er.usgs.gov/taxgroup/mollusks/zebramussel/maps/current_zm_map.jpg 2. Graduated symbol maps allow you to draw your reader's eye directly to really big concentrations of your distribution by showing them as circles or squares or rectangles that vary in size in some way that is proportionate to the concentration in an area. A very common example of such a map is a population map, where small towns are shown as dots and large towns and cities are shown as graduated circles. Here is one showing the relative size of shopping centers in the Atlanta, Georgia, area, with the key to their square footage in a legend: http://go.owu.edu/~jbkrygie/krygier_html/geog_353/geog_353_lo/geog_353_lo06_gr/simplemap.jpg Here's another, showing the relative availability of hotel rooms in and around the Quad Cities (Illinois and Iowa), in case you were planning a convention of a particular size. This map puts the data (number of rooms) in the graduated symbol, rather than in a legend. http://www.chicagocarto.com/images/quadcities.jpg 3. A divided circle map shows the relative value of something or other by the size of the graduated symbol but then breaks that symbol up in a way that allows you to see, not just relative size, but composition. Here is a map of relative industrial activity in western Germany (back when it was called "West Germany"), where the importance of an industrial center is implied by the size of the circle representing it. The map divides these circles into pie slices showing the proportion of each city's businesses that fall into particular categories (e.g., iron and steel, electrical engineering, chemicals, etc.), so you get a sense of the economic "personality" of the town. This way, you get two different kinds of information from the map with one symbol that is easy to interpret. http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/europe/west_germany_ind_1972.jpg 4. Bar chart maps can similarly show the relative local importance of various categories by the relative height of the bars (or you could just subdivide one bar proportionally). Here's an example that shows educational attainment in the Census tracts around Boston. It's a little "busy" with seven classes, and the height of the different columns is a little hard to interpret, but it does illustrate the possibilities of visualizing data spatially in this way: http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/gis/manual/normalize/ed_attainment.jpg 5. Other graduated symbol maps are possible, which can convey three or more ideas simultaneously. Here's a map entitled, "Life in Los Angeles." It was done at CSU Northridge by Dr. E. Turner and Mr. R. Doss in the late 1970s and showed four aspects of urban population geography in various parts of the City of Los Angeles by a "face" symbol (happy faces were all the rage back then). Affluence was shown by the roundness of the face (a round face meant high income, a slender face meant middle income, and a skinny face meant low income); unemployment rate by whether the mouth was upturned, downturned, or a straight line; "urban stresses" by whether the eyes had raised, straight, or scowling eyebrows; and racial structure of the population by three shadings of the face. At a glance, you could see the correlations among race, income, unemployment, and quality of the urban environment through the variations in this one graduated symbol pattern. http://www.csun.edu/%7Ehfgeg005/eturner/gallery/lifeinla.GIF 6. Flow maps can show the origin(s) of some flow (e.g., water in rivers or in managed water systems, money, oil, migration of animals or humans), its desination(s), and its magnitude by arrow symbols which point from some places to others and vary in thickness. Here is one showing the global flow of crude oil in 1997: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/security/oilflow2.gif 7. Cartograms are bizarre-looking maps, in which the areas of spatial features themselves are distorted in proportion to the value of an attribute. The features generally don't preserve the shape of the areal units being mapped, but you know which one is which by its relative position. So, you could have North American populations by country shown as three rectangles, with the huge rectangle standing for the USA being underneath the much smaller one for Canada and above the intermediate tall rectangle for Mexico. People are experimenting with animating these, too! A wonderful example was done by the New York Times of the 2004 elections. It is interactive, in the sense that you pick whether you want to see the data faithful to the geography (resulting in a red-blue choropleth map) or see the data weighted by the states' populations (which gives you a sense of the popular vote): http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/politics/2004_ELECTIONRESULTS_GRAPHIC/ Here's another cartogram of the 2004 presidential contest by Suresh Venkatasubramanian, but this one is broken out by county, not state: http://www.personal.psu.edu/cab38/GEOG321/14_multivariate02/Suresh_cartogram_purple.jpg Here's an animated cartogram that cycles through global data on population, elderly population, net immigration, tourist destinations, and refugee origins: http://www.sasi.group.shef.ac.uk/images/cartogram_animation.gif D. Choropleth maps are really simple maps, as simple as dot maps. You set up a few categories of something you're interested in (e.g., rock types, soil types, vegetation types, types of agriculture, climates, or such human phenomena as language areas, dominant religions, population density, wealth and poverty, numbers of executions). You then assign colors or ink patterns to indicate each category on your map (e.g., sandy, silty, clayey, or loamy soils; high income, medium high income, medium income, medium low income, and low income). Then, you fill the right areas on the map with the appropriate color for that area. These maps, if shaded properly (good contrast among a small number of categories and a consistent transition from lighter to darker to express values from lower to higher or higher to lower), are easily interpreted by most readers. They do have the problem of coloring an entire area with one color, even if the underlying distribution might vary a lot within that one area. The advent of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) has made this one of the most popular map types around (because choropleth maps are really easy to make in a GIS) and caused a reduction in the use of some other map types that might be better able to communicate in certain situations. That said, one nice new development is that of the animated choropleth map for use on the Internet. Here is a map of, er, animal waste concentrations among the 50 states (note the evocative color ramp the Scorecard folks used -- eeeeeuw): http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/aw/index.tcl This is an animated choropleth map showing the countries with bee industries affected by the varroa mite. The varroa mite is a spider- like parasite on honeybees. As many of you may have heard, bee colonies all around the world have been struck with "colony collapse syndrome," in which the worker bees never return to their home hives to feed the queen and "baby bees." No-one knows what is going on, but it threatens world agriculture, because many crops depend on bee pollinators. There are all kinds of hypotheses, but one is that the varroa mite might be partially responsible. http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/ikmp/images/beemap.gif E. One of the more sophisticated map types is the isoline map (sometimes isolines are called isarithms or isopleths). Isolines are any line on a map, which connects all places having the same value of "something or other," whether it be rainfall receipt, air pressure, elevation, or .... latitude and longitude! Meridians are isolines of longitude, and parallels are isolines of latitude. So, you've already bumped into this concept. Well, it can be used for all sorts of other "stuff" than latitude and longitude and it very effectively conveys a third dimension in a two-dimensional map. 1. Some types of isolines include: a. Isohyets connect all places in an area having the same precipitation, whether on the same day or averaged out over a long time. This map shows 12-month rainfall totals in Australia: http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/climate/rainmaps.cgi?page=map&variable=totals&period=12month&area=aus b. Isotherms connect all places having the same temperature (e.g., the same daytime high or nighttime low on a given day or the same average annual temperature or the same average January nighttime low). This map illustrates the concept by showing mean maximum temperatures over the course of a year in Australia: http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/climate/tempmaps.cgi?page=map&variable=tmaxav&period=12month&area=aus c. Isobars connect all places having the same barometric or atmospheric pressure. Here is one showing a high pressure and a low pressure center near New Zealand and Australia: https://home.csulb.edu/~rodrigue/geog140/isobarsnewzealand.gif d. Isogons connect all points having the same compass deviation. i. True north is not the same as magnetic north: They're presently misaligned by about 1,600 km (1,000 mi.), which puts the magnetic north pole in Canada, at Prince of Wales Island in the far north of the country. ii. This can mess you up if you are using a compass to navigate around when you're hiking, especially if you're in an area, where the angle between your location, the North Pole, and the magnetic north pole is fairly wide (that angle is called magnetic declination). iii. Some maps, especially USGS and similar maps, show magnetic declination as an angle formed by two arrows, one pointing true north and the other pointing to the magnetic north pole. The magnetic declination is normally stated in degrees and a date given (because the magnetic north pole wanders a bit through time, just to mess you up some more). You lay the map down under your compass and fiddle with it until the magnetic north pole line aligns with the compass arrow. Then your map will be aligned so that north on the map points to north in the landscape you're in. You can now take some decent bearings to get yourself un-lost and back to camp before sunset! iv. There are maps of magnetic declination that show you what the typical difference between true north and magnetic north is in a particular area. They connect places having the same delination with isolines called isagons. v. So, please visit the map linked just below vi and figure out about how many degrees east magnetic north would be from true north in our Los Angeles-Long Beach area (interpolate between the two isagons that bracket Our Fair City). vi. Which major American city would have its compasses pointing true north? Which one would have the most seriously misaligned compasses? San Francisco? New York? Boston? Chicago? New Orleans? Seattle? http://www.gly.fsu.edu/~kish/field/projects/p4/isogon2.gif vii. Just to drive you nuts, some folks use the word, "isogon," to mean an isoline of constant wind direction and others use it to describe an equilateral polygon in geometry. Oh, well. e. Contours connect all points having the same elevation. You can see how they are constructed in the cross-section below, where every place at the same elevation on a mountain is sliced with an imaginary plane at that elevation. If we imagined a line being left on the mountain showing the slice, we could then turn the image over so that we're looking directly down on the mountain and see the slice lines as a series of concentric circles coming together around the peak of the mountain! f. Isochron maps connect all places the same time interval from or to some reference point. For example, you could map how long it takes for the primary waves from a particular earthquake to reach various seismic recording stations. Here is a map showing how long it would take to go from Cambridge (or get to Cambridge), England, using the British railway system. http://www.mysociety.org/2006/travel-time-maps/rail-cambridge-1500px.png g. You can even combine two isoline maps in one, if you're really careful about color use. Here is a really nifty map that superimposes isobars as solid lines on top of isotherms shown as the boundaries between colors that imply hotter or colder. This is updated each day: http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/wx/cwp/prods/current/sfctmpslp/sfctmpslp_N.gif 2. Isoline maps convey a lot of precise information by letting you infer what the values of any particular spot are by noting how far it is to the two nearest isolines and interpolating its exact value by its relative distance to each of them. So, a point one fourth of the way from an air pressure reading of 1016 millibars to one of 1020 millibars could be read as having an air pressure that time of 1017 mb. You engaged in this kind of interpolation when you figured out the magnetic declination in Long Beach (~15°E of true north). 3. A contour map can be turned into a shaded relief map, which puts in shadows and bright areas as though the map were being lit from one spot. It makes the map look more suggestive of a real terrain, with the third dimension sort of popping out at you. Here's a nice example of Pike's Peak in Colorado from MindBird Maps & Books: http://www.mindbird.com/2f770f2f0.jpg 4. Sometimes people combine the third dimensional virtues of the isoline map with the easy interpretability of the choropleth map by shading in the areas between key isolines. So, for example, you can shade contour line maps so that really high elevations are red, high elevations are brown, medium elevations are yellow, low elevations are chartreuse, and really low elevations are dark green, or you can use any other continuum of colors to do the job. The colors you use to represent different elevation ranges are called "hypsometric tints." By adding hypsometric tints, you have the precision of isoline maps (you can interpolate any location's elevation, for instance) and the visual generality of color. Your eye is immediately drawn to the high spots and the low spots, without needing to sit around and interpolate. Here's a nice example from up in Idaho: http://www.uidaho.edu/biogeochemistry/images/mickey_hs_contour.gif 5. A newer development involves combining these hypsometrically- tinted maps with the idea of shaded relief at the same time. These can really create a stunning effect if the hypsometric tints are in a narrow color range, from green to brown, so that the map looks like a realistic landscape. Here's a nice example of a hypsometrically-tinted contour map of Southern California: http://geology.com/news/images/shaded-relief-map.jpg. Here is a really great example generated from the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter data for the planet "next door," with place names supplied by yours truly. Mars has FAR greater elevational contrast than anything on Earth, so the green/brown palette will not do it justice. So, this map uses a huge range of vivid colors from black to white. It ramps from black/purple/blue for the lowest elevations up through green, yellow, orange, red, brown, beige, and white for higher and higher elevations. The result seems to bias the reader into supporting the arguments that Mars once had oceans and seas, doesn't it? https://home.csulb.edu/~rodrigue/mars/MOLAmercatorlabel.jpg 6. There are all sorts of experiments with animated maps, which take the USGS electronic version of contours (digital elevation models) as the basis of animated fly-throughs or rotating blocks. So far, these are more golly gee-whiz special effects than devices for communicating too much knowledge, but they are pretty cool. If you have a fast connection and a little time, do check out the fly- through of the great Martian canyon, Valles Marineris, prepared for NASA by JPL and Arizona State University: http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Valles+Marineris+fly+through&hl=en F. Haptic maps, or maps that use sound to convey information, are emerging as interesting augmentations of mapping. They could be used to allow blind or visually-challenged people to make use of maps designed around this other sense. Here's an example of a haptic map for navigating around UC Santa Barbara: http://soundscapes.geog.ucsb.edu/sound_touch_map/flash/mapinterface3.html Here is an animated, haptic map of the Coalition casualties in Iraq from 20 March 2003 until 13 February 2007 created by Tim O'Bleek. This is a dot map, in that each dot represents one soldier's death and its haptic equivalent is a soft tick sound, rather like you'd hear on an old typewriter in a newsroom. Each death is accompanied by a large red dot which fades over a month through pink until it disappears, leaving only the black dot. If there is a concentration of deaths in one area on one day, O'Bleek expresses that by using a more intensely red dot and a louder ticking sound. The map is also interactive, in that you can select which Coalition country's casualties to view or not view, and you can ask to see major place names, too. This is a heartbreaking cartographic representation of the geography of soldiers' deaths through time and an affecting memorial to their sacrifice (and that of their families and friends): http://www.obleek.com/iraq/ G. Cartography is undergoing many changes now with the increasing use of computer-aided design (CAD) technologies, mapping packages and other graphics software, and geographical information systems (GIS). 1. GIS are extremely powerful, fully-searchable relational database management systems (RDBMS) that handle spatial data and, best of all, perform all sorts of spatial analyses on them and put out the results as maps (with tables and graphs, if you so choose). It's their spatial analytic capacities that set them apart from other RDBMS and from computerized mapping packages. 2. To imagine what they're capable of, think of a virtual transparency containing a map of, say, the rivers and water features in an area. Now imagine another virtual transparency, say, a contour map of the local topography. Then, another map of vegetation in the area. What about another virtual map of land use patterns by parcel? Keep on adding imaginary maps on virtual transparencies to your heart's content. 3. Now, imagine overlaying all of these transparencies on an overhead projector or light table to find all the areas that are within 100 meters of a river, on slope angles less than 10 percent, historically covered with riparian (riverside) vegetation, and that are not presently developed, so that you can identify riparian habitat that should be preserved through zoning codes. 4. After overlaying just a few of these transparencies, you probably would not be able to pick out the areas of interest to your planning agency, would you? Well, this is what the GIS can do for you! It can analyze every bit of land for all of that stuff -- dozens of virtual maps -- and create new maps of the results of its analysis. These things are really cool, and there are some stunningly well-paid jobs for graduates with solid training in GIS, cartography, and spatial statistics. You can get that training as a geography major or by getting our GIS/cartography certificate. Well, that's enough for your whirlwind introduction to map symbolization (and maps in general). I apologize for using links to illustrate this lecture. Some of the images are quite large, so I didn't want you to be sitting there on your 28.8K or 56K modems, stewing during an eternal download. It's faster to just send you to one graphic at a time for shorter downloads, but I know it is a pain to be pointing and clicking. I hope you come away from this with an appreciation of maps as art and as the effective communication of scientific and historical content. Later on in the semester, I'll have a lab on contour mapping. Right now, I want you to focus on the first exam, which will cover these eleven lectures and the first two chapters in your textbook. In your studying, focus on major concepts, definitions, processes, not so much on memorizing facts and figures. Have as good a week as getting ready for an exam permits!
Document and © maintained by Dr.
Rodrigue
First placed on web: 09/22/00
Last revised: 06/09/07