One of the things a biogeographer might want to do is evaluate the spatial pattern of a plant species' distribution in a particular area. There are all kinds of techniques that can be used for this sort of "point pattern analysis" problem. This lab introduces you to one technique in biogeography, nearest- neighbor analysis, which is often used to describe a spatial pattern as "clumped," "random," or "uniform."
For all questions on this lab, please do your calculations at the full capacity of your spreadsheet or calculator, but round your answers at the very end to three decimal places of accuracy (i.e., 0.000).
Examine the distribution of adult fetid lilac shrubs, Ceanothus foetidus (which I made up, by the way, so don't go running to the Munz flora in the excitement of learning about a new chaparral plant!) in Figure 1. The area mapped is a hillside in the Sulphur Mountain area of Ventura County (which does exist and, ooooo, is it stinky!). In your cursory look at this map, do you see a tendency for the plants to cluster at all, or do they seem uniform (like an orchard) in their distribution?
You get to employ nearest-neighbor analysis to ascertain whether your hunch is right: Nearest-neighbor analysis creates a descriptive statistic, R, which indicates whether this "species" at this scale has a clumped, uniform, or random distribution.
Calculating the nearest-neighbor co-efficient (R) entails the tedious process of measuring the distance between each point in a given space and the point that is its nearest neighbor. It should be noted that Point A may well have Point B as its nearest neighbor, but Point B may have another point entirely, say, C, as its nearest neighbor. Anyhow, having measured all those nearest neighbor distances, you figure out the mean nearest-neighbor distance
Next, you then create an expected mean nearest-neighbor distance from the density of the points in your study area. You are now in a position to create R as the ratio of the mean observed nearest-neighbor distance to this expected mean nearest-neighbor distance.
R can vary from 0 to 2.149 (I've always liked that extra .149 bit!). A score of 0 means perfect clustering: All points are found at the exact same point in space (which is, of course, a physical impossibility if your study entails point data collected at one time). A score of 2.149 means perfect uniformity. A score of 1 represents perfectly random distribution of points in space. So, you can use this descriptive statistic to characterize a distribution as more clustered or more uniform or just random.
n = ________
A = ________
p = ________
# r # r # r 1) ________ 11) ________ 21) ________ 2) ________ 12) ________ 22) ________ 3) ________ 13) ________ 23) ________ 4) ________ 14) ________ 24) ________ 5) ________ 15) ________ 25) ________ 6) ________ 16) ________ 26) ________ 7) ________ 17) ________ 27) ________ 8) ________ 18) ________ 28) ________ 9) ________ 19) ________ 29) ________ 10) ________ 20) ________ 30) ________
_ ro = _________
_ 1 1 re = ____ or ___ ____ ___ 2\/ n/A 2\/ p _ re = ________
_ ro R = _____ _ re = ________
_________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________
first placed on the web: 11/26/98
last revised: 05/21/01
© Dr. Christine M.
Rodrigue