Geography 109-01
Geographical Research and Writing
Fall 1998
Instructor Information
Instructor: Dr. C.M. Rodrigue; Butte Hall 539; 898-4953
or -5285
Instructor's Email Address:
lapaloma@ecst.csuchico.edu
Office Hours: Tuesday/Thursday 9:30-11 a.mm; Wednesday 9:30-11:30 a.m.
Course Description:
Examination and evaluation of library research materials pertinent to
geography. Practice in analysis and writing of geographical reports.
Successful completion required for all Geography and Planning majors before
enrolling in WP course to meet writing requirement.
Formerly GEOG 109A.
Course Objectives:
- to prepare you to make sophisticated use of the library for
geographical and planning research
- to familiarize you with the major journals in geography and
planning and the current trends in the disciplines
- to familiarize you with the Internet as a research tool
- to sharpen your writing skills
- to develop your editorial skills
- to heighten your ability to do critical and analytical reading
- to develop your collaborative work skills
- to initiate a Web-based portfolio of your best geographic work
- to improve your presentation skills
Required Course Materials:
- None: the library will be the "textbook" (a budget break!)
Recommended Course Materials:
- Marino, The College Student's Resumé Guide
- Johnson, The Handbook of Good English
Course Requirements:
- attend all scheduled class meetings
- examine and make notes about all geography and planning sources assigned
- produce all library research papers and other assignments in a timely manner
- make a brief class presentation
- take final examination
Grading:
Grading is on a modified curve. Normally, about 40-50 percent of the
class receive the "C" grade, with up to another 10 percent earning the "A"
and the "F" grades. The course GPA, then, averages about 2.00. If the
class is particularly good (or ... bad), I will adjust the grade
distribution accordingly, so that the collective GPA is
higher (or ... lower). I generally do not use the +/- grading system, except,
rarely, in the "C" range.
Grading is based on the following 1000 points:
________________________________________________________________________________
DUE DATES
attendance ...................................... 100
current trends in the top journals in
a geography or planning subfield ........... 75 ... T, 09/15
current trends in a subject in that subfield,
which you find particularly interesting .... * 200 ... T, 10/06
senior thesis proposal .......................... * 75 ... T, 10/27
your editorial work ............................. 100 ... T, 10/13, T, 11/03
your future resume .............................. 50 ... T, 11/10
web page suitable for a professional
portfolio of your work ..................... 75 ... T, 11/17
examination of geographical materials ........... 200 ... Th, 11/19
brief presentation on your proposal ............. 75 ... 12/1-12/10
final examination ............................... 50 ... Th, 12/17: 10-12
* = assignments students will be editing for one another
Attendance:
Attendance at every scheduled class is required. You will start with 100
points and will lose 10 of them each time you miss class. If your absence is
excused for some compelling reason, you will lose only 5 points. If you lose
more than 50 points on attendance, you will be failed, no matter how well
you're doing on your assignments.
It is important that you participate in class: Do the research and be
able to discuss the assignments. If it becomes apparent that only your
body is attending class, I may deduct points from your attendance score.
About Editing:
It's not you! Research and writing in geography, planning, or anything
else do not come easily to most people, even advanced professionals.
Most people have problems with grammar, spelling, syntax, or the basic
organization of their ideas, which they typically miss on proofreading their
own work. Because of this basic human frailty, even the most
professional writers rely on others for help in picking out errors and
improving their communications. Writing, then, is not just writing: it is
almost invariably RE-writing.
You will be asked to "savage" the work of a small number of your peers: Two
of the assignments are to be critiqued by other students before the Majestic
Final Draft is given to me. For these assignments, you will be turning
in your rough drafts, your peers' signed comments, the name of the person
you considered most helpful to you in your revision work, and the final
draft. Your performance as an editor will be evaluated by me at that time.
Tender-heartedness at this task is not really kindness to yourself or your
colleagues: It can hurt you as well as denying your peers of a valuable
critic. It is hoped that, in your misery, you will form casual networks
of trustworthy, objective critics (circles of vultures?) to whom you can
turn for editorial assistance in the rest of your career here.