GEOG 109-01

Geographical Research and Writing

Senior Thesis Proposal Peer Critique Guidelines

==============================

        
        
        Colleague's name: _________________________________________________________
        
                                                                         act   poss
                                                                         pts    pts
        
        CONTENT:
        
        A.  The context
             1.  Does your colleague identify the subfield(s)
                 in which his or her proposed project fits? ..........   ____     1
             2.  Does your colleague develop the intellectual
                 context of the proposed project?  In other
                 words, does s/he briefly summarize the 
                 existing research on the topic, with an eye
                 to showing how the proposed project might
                 add some necessary or interesting information
                 to that area of study?  Are you convinced the
                 student is actually conversant enough with 
                 the literature of the chosen subfield to be
                 able to justify and carry out a senior thesis
                 in this area?  That is, do you think your
                 colleague has done his or her homework in 
                 setting the stage for the senior thesis?  One
                 is okay, 2 is good, and 3 is truly excellent. .......   ____     3
             3.  Does your colleague indicate why the topic
                 might be important to society, the environ-
                 ment, or the disciplines of geography or
                 planning? ...........................................   ____     2
        
        B.   The purpose statement
             1.  Is this sentence clear and easy to understand?
                 Does it concisely indicate what the proposed
                 project is going to accomplish?
             2.  Does this sentence imply the approach your
                 colleague will take to tackle the project
                 (does it suggest the sorts of data and methods
                 that might be used)?  ...............................   ____     2
        
        C.   Data
             1.  Does the proposal describe the kinds of data
                 your colleague will collect to accomplish the
                 purpose of the project?  ............................   ____     2
             2.  Will your colleague collect original data on
                 his or her own?  OR has the student identified  
                 high quality secondary data that s/he plans to
                 subject to original analysis? .......................   ____     4
             3.  Does your colleague plan ONLY to use informa-
                 tion already collected and analyzed by other
                 researchers (as in existing articles and 
                 books) and just report on it?  ......................   ____    -4
        
        D.   Methods
             1.  Does your colleague discuss the methods s/he
                 will use to collect original or secondary data?  ....   ____     2
             2.  Does the proposal mention the specific methods
                 to be used to interpret or analyze these data?  .....   ____     4
        
        E.   Feasibility
             1.  Does the proposal contain a tentative timeline   
                 of reasonable activities, properly sequencing
                 what needs to be done to accomplish the pur-
                 pose in a semester's timeframe?  ....................   ____     1
             2.  Do you believe that your colleague can
                 feasibly accomplish the project described in
                 the timeframe of a semester?  Really?  You can
                 generally tell the student is in trouble if
                 the proposal is filled with fuzzy generalities
                 and evasions or if the project, even if well
                 thought out, is too cosmic and ambitious for
                 an advanced undergraduate to pull off in the
                 frenzy of the senior year.  .........................   ____     2
        
             SUM OF CONTENT: .........................................   ____    23
        

==============================

        WRITING AND DOCUMENTATION MECHANICS:
        
        A.   Does your colleague follow Annals format in
             documentation?  .........................................   ____     1
        
        B.   Is every reference in the text also in the refer-
             ence list and vice-versa?  ..............................   ____     1
        
        C.   Is the paper well-organized and easy to follow?  ........   ____     2
        
        D.   Is the spelling perfect?  ...............................   ____     2
        
        E.   Is the grammar perfect?  ................................   ____     1
          
        F.   Is sentence structure correct, complete, and varied?  ...   ____     2
        
        G.   Is the paper free of potentially sexist usage?  .........   ____     1
        
             SUM OF WRITING AND DOCUMENTATION MECHANICS:  ............   ____    10
        

==============================

        
        SUM OF POINTS (add totals for content and writing): ..........   ____    33
        
        HELPFUL COMMENTS FOR YOUR COLLEAGUE:
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        

==============================

document maintained by Dr. Rodrigue
last revised: 10/26/98

==============================