CECS 100
LAB ASSIGNMENT 9
Assigned date: 10/23
Due date: Wednesday 11/6
40 points
Do problem 7 in chapter 7 on page 403. Data file
Incorrect questions: 3, 7, 13, and 17.
Grading
| Criteria | Approx. % of Grade | Excellent (100%) | Adequate (80%) | Poor (60%) | Not Met (0%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Specification /Correctioness | 50%(10 points) | No errors, program always works correctly and meets the specification(s). | Minor details of the program specification are violated, program functions incorrectly for some inputs. | Significant details of the specification are violated, program often exhibits incorrect behavior. | Program only functions correctly in very limited cases or not at all. |
| Readability | 20% (4 points) | No errors, code is clean, understandable, and well-organized. | Minor issues with consistent indentation, use of whitespace, variable naming, or general organization. | At least one major issue with indentation, whitespace, variable names, or organization. | Major problems with at three or four of the readability subcategories. |
| Documentation | 10% (2 points) | No errors, code is well-commented. | One or two places that could benefit from comments are missing them or the code is overly commented. | File header missing, complicated lines or sections of code uncommented or lacking meaningful comments. | No file header or comments present. |
| Code Efficiency | 15% (3 points) | No errors, code uses the best approach in every case. | No errors, code uses the working approach in every case. | Code uses poorly-chosen approaches in at least one place. | Many things in the code could have been accomplished in an easier, faster, or otherwise better fashion. |
| Assignment Specifications | 5% (1 point) | No errors | N/A | Minor details of the assignment specification are violated, such as files named incorrectly or extra instructions slightly misunderstood. | Significant details of the specification are violated, such as extra instructions ignored or entirely misunderstood. |