CECS 100
LAB ASSIGNMENT 5
Assigned date: 9/30
Due date:   Monday 10/7
30 points

Problem 1 [15 points]

Create a Raptor flowchart  to represent the logic of a program that asks the user to enter four test score. The program displays the grade for each test score and the average of all four test scores. Use a loop to input four test scores. Use the grading table below to assign a grade to the test score.

Test Score Average Letter Grade
90-100 A
80-89 B
70-79 C
60-69 D
Below 60 F

Input
Enter a test score: 55
Enter a test score: 96
Enter a test score: 73
Enter a test score: 82

Output
Test score: 55
Letter grade : F
Test score: 96
Letter grade : A
Test score: 73
Letter grade : C
Test score: 82
Letter grade : B
Test score average = 76.5000

Problem 2 [15 points]

Redo problem 2 using Python.

 

Lab assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria Approx. % of Grade Excellent (100%) Adequate (80%)  Poor (60%) Not Met (0%)
Program Specification /Correctioness 50%(10 points) No errors, program always works correctly and meets the specification(s). Minor details of the program specification are violated, program functions incorrectly for some inputs. Significant details of the specification are violated, program often exhibits incorrect behavior. Program only functions correctly in very limited cases or not at all.
Readability 20% (4 points) No errors, code is clean, understandable, and well-organized. Minor issues with consistent indentation, use of whitespace, variable naming, or general organization. At least one major issue with indentation, whitespace, variable names, or organization. Major problems with at three or four of the readability subcategories.
Documentation 10% (2 points) No errors, code is well-commented. One or two places that could benefit from comments are missing them or the code is overly commented. File header missing, complicated lines or sections of code uncommented or lacking meaningful comments. No file header or comments present.
Code Efficiency 15% (3 points) No errors, code uses the best approach in every case. No errors, code uses the working approach in every case.  Code uses poorly-chosen approaches in at least one place. Many things in the code could have been accomplished in an easier, faster, or otherwise better fashion.
Assignment Specifications 5% (1 point) No errors N/A Minor details of the assignment specification are violated, such as files named incorrectly or extra instructions slightly misunderstood. Significant details of the specification are violated, such as extra instructions ignored or entirely misunderstood.