CECS 100
LAB ASSIGNMENT 10
Assigned date: 11/13
Due date:   Monday 11/18
30 points


Do problems 14 and 15 in chapter 7 on page 406.

Text file named 1994_Weekly_Gas_Averages.txt  for problem 15.

Grading

Lab assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria Approx. % of Grade Excellent (100%) Adequate (80%)  Poor (60%) Not Met (0%)
Program Specification /Correctioness 50%(10 points) No errors, program always works correctly and meets the specification(s). Minor details of the program specification are violated, program functions incorrectly for some inputs. Significant details of the specification are violated, program often exhibits incorrect behavior. Program only functions correctly in very limited cases or not at all.
Readability 20% (4 points) No errors, code is clean, understandable, and well-organized. Minor issues with consistent indentation, use of whitespace, variable naming, or general organization. At least one major issue with indentation, whitespace, variable names, or organization. Major problems with at three or four of the readability subcategories.
Documentation 10% (2 points) No errors, code is well-commented. One or two places that could benefit from comments are missing them or the code is overly commented. File header missing, complicated lines or sections of code uncommented or lacking meaningful comments. No file header or comments present.
Code Efficiency 15% (3 points) No errors, code uses the best approach in every case. No errors, code uses the working approach in every case.  Code uses poorly-chosen approaches in at least one place. Many things in the code could have been accomplished in an easier, faster, or otherwise better fashion.
Assignment Specifications 5% (1 point) No errors N/A Minor details of the assignment specification are violated, such as files named incorrectly or extra instructions slightly misunderstood. Significant details of the specification are violated, such as extra instructions ignored or entirely misunderstood.