Golnaz Tabibnia
Postdoctoral Fellow, Social Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory
University of California, Los Angeles
golnaz@ucla.edu

Abstract

Neuroeconomics and Well-Being

Behavioral economists, psychologists, and neuroscientists have independently studied human welfare for decades, using behavioral, self-report, and neurobiological measures to identify what people want and like. However, not until recently have the three disciplines combined their methodologies, in the emerging field of neuroeconomics, to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of personal choice and well-being. I review some of these studies demonstrating that humans find pleasurable not just the material things needed for basic survival, but also some more abstract social experiences like being treated fairly and cooperating with and trusting others. These studies show that the same reward regions of the brain that respond to chocolate and money also respond to social connectedness. However, it is not the case that experiences activating this reward circuitry are necessarily good for our long-term well-being. For example, this same reward circuitry also gets activated in response to addictive drugs and drug-related cues. I will discuss the general implications of these findings for well-being and ways in which we should exercise caution when interpreting neuroscientific data.